Israel Shamir: Counter Coup in Crimea
March 9, 2014
The real story is now developing in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, a story of resistance to the pro-Western takeover.IF THE WEST CAN PUT ITS PUPPETS IN POWER IN KIEV,
WHY CAN'T RUSSIA DO THE SAME IN CRIMEA AND DONBAS?
"Though [Putin] would like the Ukraine to be friendly to Russia, annexing it, in whole or in part, has never been his ambition. It would be too expensive even for wealthy Russia: the average income in the Ukraine is just half of the Russian one, and its infrastructure is in a shambles."
(Israel Shamir, left, is a Moscow-based journalist, a Jew who converted to Christianity and is very critical of the Zionist Occupational Government, i.e. the NWO.)
by ISRAEL SHAMIR
Two Invasions: The Ukrainian Pendulum
(Abrdiged by henrymakow.com)
The stakes are high in the Ukraine: after the coup, as Crimea and Donbas asserted their right to self determination, American and Russian troops entered Ukrainian territory, both under cover.
The American soldiers are "military advisers", ostensibly members of Blackwater private army (renamed Academi); a few hundred of them patrol Kiev while others try to suppress the revolt in Donetsk. Officially, they were invited by the new West-installed regime. They are the spearhead of the US invasion attempting to prop up the regime and break down all resistance. They have already bloodied their hands in Donetsk.
Besides, the Pentagon has doubled the number of US fighter jets on a NATO air patrol mission in the Baltics; the US air carrier entered the Black Sea, some US Marines reportedly landed in Lvov "as a part of pre-planned manoeuvres".
The Russian soldiers ostensibly belong to the Russian Fleet, legally stationed in Crimea. They were in Crimea before the coup, in accordance with the Russian-Ukrainian treaty (like the US 5th fleet in Kuwait), but their presence was probably beefed up...
It is only the Russian presence which is described as an "invasion" by the Western media, while the American one is hardly mentioned. "We have a moral duty to stick our nose in your business in your backyard a world away from our homeland. It's for your own good", wrote an ironic American blogger.
Moscow woke up to trouble in Ukraine after its preoccupation, nay obsession, with the Winter Olympic games had somewhat abated, -- when people began to say that "Putin won the games and lost the Ukraine". Indeed, while Putin watched sports in Sochi, the Brown Revolution succeeded in Ukraine. A great European country the size of France, the biggest republic of the former USSR (save Russia), was taken over by a coalition of Ukrainian ultra-nationalists and (mainly Jewish) oligarchs.
The legitimate president was forced to flee for his very life. Members of Parliament were manhandled, and in some cases their children were taken hostage to ensure their vote, as their houses were visited by gunmen. The putsch was completed. The West recognized the new government; Russia refused to recognize it, but continued to deal with it on a day -to-day basis. However the real story is now developing in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, a story of resistance to the pro-Western takeover.
JEWISH OLIGARCHS FINANCED PUTSCH
The economic situation of Ukraine is dreadful. They are where Russia was in the 1990s, before Putin - in Ukraine the Nineties never ended. For years the country was ripped off by the oligarchs who siphoned off profits to Western banks, bringing it to the very edge of the abyss. To avoid default and collapse, the Ukraine was to receive a Russian loan of 15 billion euros without preconditions, but then came the coup. Now the junta's prime minister will be happy to receive a mere one billion dollars from the US via IMF. (Europeans have promised more, but in a few years' time...)
He already accepted the conditions of the IMF, which will mean austerity, unemployment and debt bondage. Probably this was the raison d'être for the coup. IMF and US loans are a major source of profit for the financial community, and they are used to enslave debtor countries, as Perkins explained at length.
The oligarchs who financed the Maidan operation divided the spoils: the most generous supporter, multi-billionaire Igor "Benya" Kolomoysky, left, received the great Russian-speaking city of Dnepropetrovsk in fief. He was not required to give up his Israeli passport. His brethren oligarchs took other Russian-speaking industrial cities, including Kharkov and Donetsk, the Ukrainian Chicago or Liverpool. Kolomoysky is not just an 'oligarch of Jewish origin': he is an active member of the Jewish community, a supporter of Israel and a donor of many synagogues, one of them the biggest in Europe. He had no problem supporting the neo-Nazis, even those whose entry to the US had been banned because of their declared antisemitism. That is why the appeals to Jewish consciousness against the Brown putsch demonstrably failed.
Now came the nationalists' crusade against Russian-speakers (ethnic Russians and Russian-speaking Ukrainians - the distinction is moot), chiefly industrial workers of East and South of the country. The Kiev regime banned the Communist Party and the Regions' Party (the biggest party of the country, mainly supported by the Russian-speaking workers). The regime's first decree banned the Russian language from schools, radio and TV, and forbade all official use of Russian. The Minister of Culture called Russian-speakers "imbeciles" and proposed to jail them for using the banned tongue in public places. Another decree threatened every holder of dual Russian/Ukrainian nationality with a ten-years jail sentence, unless he gives up the Russian one right away.
Not empty words, these threats: The storm-troopers of the Right Sector, the leading fighting force of the New Order, went around the country terrorizing officials, taking over government buildings, beating up citizens, destroying Lenin's statues, smashing memorials of the Second World War and otherwise enforcing their rule. A video showed a Right Sector fighter mistreating the city attorney while police looked other way.
They began to hunt down riot policemen who supported the ex-president, and they burned down a synagogue or two. They tortured a governor, and lynched some technicians they found in the former ruling party's headquarters. They started to take over the Orthodox churches of the Russian rite, intending to transfer them to their own Greek-Catholic Church.
Russia was not involved in Ukrainian developments: Putin did not want to be accused of meddling in Ukrainian internal affairs, even when the US and EU envoys assisted and directed the rebels. The people of Russia would applaud him if he were to send his tanks to Kiev to regain the whole of Ukraine, as they consider it an integral part of Russia. But Putin is not a Russian nationalist, not a man of Imperial designs. Though he would like the Ukraine to be friendly to Russia, annexing it, in whole or in part, has never been his ambition. It would be too expensive even for wealthy Russia: the average income in the Ukraine is just half of the Russian one, and its infrastructure is in a shambles. (Compare to the very costly West German takeover of the GDR.) It would not be easy, either, for every Ukrainian government in the past twenty years has drenched the people with anti-Russian sentiment. But involvement was forced upon Putin:
Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians voted with their feet and fled to Russia, asking for asylum. Two hundred thousand refugees checked in during the weekend.
THE RISING
The people of Crimea rose, dismissed their compromise-seeking officials and elected a new leader, Mr Sergey Aksyonov. The new leadership took over Crimea and asked for Russian troops...
The parliament of Crimea voted to join Russia, but this vote should be confirmed by a poll on March 16 to determine Crimea's future -- whether it will revert to Russia or remain an autonomous republic within the Ukraine. From my conversation with locals, it seems that they would prefer to join the Russian Federation they left on Khrushchev's orders only a half century ago.
Given the Russian-language issue and the consanguinity, this makes sense: Ukraine is broke, Russia is solvent and ready to assume its protection. Ukraine can't pay salaries and pensions, Russia had promised to do so. Kiev was taking away the lion's share of income generated in Crimea by Russian tourists; now the profits will remain in the peninsula and presumably help repair the rundown infrastructure. Real estate would likely rise drastically in price, optimistic natives surmise, and this view is shared by Russian businessmen. They already say that Crimea will beat out Sochi in a few years' time, as drab old stuff will be replaced by Russian Imperial chic...
The Ukraine hasn't got much of an army, as the oligarchs stole everything ever assigned to the military. The Kiev regime does not rely on its army anyway. Their attempt to draft able-bodied men failed immediately as hardly anybody answered the call. They still intend to squash the [counter] revolution. Another three hundred Blackwater mercenaries landed Wednesday in Kiev airport. The Kiev regime applied for NATO help and expressed its readiness to allow US missiles to be stationed in the Ukraine. Missiles in the Ukraine (as now stationed in Poland, also too close for Russian comfort) would probably cross Russia's red line, just as Russian missiles in Cuba crossed America's red line in 1962. Retired Israeli intelligence chief Yaakov Kedmi, an expert on Russia, said that in his view the Russians just can't allow that, at any price, even if this means all-out war.
Putin asked the upper house of the Russian parliament for permission to deploy Russian troops if needed, and the parliament unanimously approved his request. They will probably be deployed in order to defend the workers in case of attack by a Right Sector beefed up by Blackwater mercenaries. Humanitarian catastrophe, large-scale disturbances, the flow of refugees or the arrival of NATO troops could also force Putin's hand, even against his will.
----
[English language editing by Ken Freeland]
Israel Shamir can be reached on adam@israelshamir.net
First Comment from Dan:
Finally, somebody with the straight dope on events in Ukraine. I was in direct (face to face) contact with a pro-Russian Ukraine professor at the time of the Orange Revolution in 2004. He was the first to inform me that the 'revolution' was a total hoax funded by the banker's slush fund, George Soros' 'Open Society' Foundation. Now get this - no where else did I find what he told his contacts who were actually in the square in Kiev at the time.
American Blackwater,, British MI6, and MOSSAD operatives were directing the event from the shadows, letting their presence be known by openly carrying weapons. They were directing teams of youth who set up kiosks to dispense 'Orange Revolution' banners, shirts, scarves, etc. and handing out free vodka and sausages to people who would put these on and paying five bucks cash American to those who took seats. As the enthusiasm, he said "they were drunk".
Well, the Orange Revolution and IMF puppet Victor Yuschenko came and went, so now they've done it again. Except the early waves of 'Color revolutions' were 'Velvet Glove' when they could still fool enough of the public. Now they can't, so the second wave of revolutions is the IRON FIST. Violence.
Those reading your site that don't really know the history of Russia and Eastern Europe since the "fall" of the Soviet Union must catch up very quickly lest they be fooled into supporting more wars. Here's an even handed retrospective from the BBC.
The Rise and The Fall of The Russian Oligarchs and the Rise of Putin
Jerome said (March 10, 2014):
The reason the Ukraine has been stuck, in spite of its great potential, likewise Russia hardly improves in spite of its own much greater potential is Central-Banking, which rules these countries from within,keeping them short of the venture capital which would invariably allow them to prosper.
This tragedy was enforced by means of the western-orchestrated Bolshevik revolution (see this primer documentary Film:
(Full) In the Shadow of Hermes by Jüri Lina (2009) )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIuW-vNQsQI
which usurped Russia by means of the USSR,
stirred by the Comintern [Link:History of the Communist International]
https://www.marxists.org/history/international/comintern/
till Stalin shut it down in May 1943.
and the western conducted Intervention-war [Wikipedia]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_intervention_in_the_Russian_Civil_War
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzKuwxMPbdk
[Video]
which robbed Russia of its Tsarist gold (a quarter of the world's global).
Putin was appointed by 'the Family'
because he is not likely to purge the people who raised and promoted him. Here's a superb French documentary film on this subject, a true Primer: The Putin System
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zA-1qQF5UpY